DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

PETITIONER FILED ADMINSTRATIVE CASE AT BSP AGAINST OFFICERS OF RESPONDENT BANK. BSP OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DISMISSED THE CASE. PETITIONER FILED AT CA AN APPEAL BASED ON RULE 65, THAT THERE WAS GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION. PETITIONER WAS WRONG. THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL BASIS. NEITHER CAN THE CASE BE REVIEWED UNDER RULE 45 BECAUSE ISSUES OF FACTS WERE RAISED. ONLY ISSUES OF LAW ARE ALLOWED UNDER RULE 45.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0047-willy-fred-u.-begay-vs.-office-of-the-special-investigation-e28093-bangko-sentral-ng-pilipinas-et-alDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.