Category: FIND YOUR FORM.


CASE 2020-0012: MERIAM M. URMAZA VS. HON. REGIONAL PROCESUTOR NANNATUS CAESAR R. ROJA/HON. ASSISTANT PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR JUDYLITO V. ULANDAY AND RAMON TORRES DOMINGO (G.R. NO. 240012. JANUARY 22, 2020) (SUBJECT/S: PROCEDURE IN APPEALING RESOLUTIONS OF THE PROVINCIAL AND CITY PROSECUTORS; ORAL DEFAMATION; INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR) (BRIEF TITLE: URMANZA VS REGIONAL PROSECUTOR ROJA ET AL)

 

DISPOSITIVE:

 

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

 

PETITIONER FILED AT THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE A CASE FOR ORAL DEFAMATION AND INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR. THE PROSECUTOR DISMISSED THE CASES  FOR INSUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. PETITIONER FILED AN APPEAL WITH THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL PROSECUTOR WHO ALSO DISMISSED THE APPEAL. PETITIONER THEN FILED PETITION FOR CERTIORARI AT CA. CA DISMISSED PETITION FOR BEING FILED INCORRECTLY AT CA. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILED AT DOJ. SUPREME COURT AFFIRMED RULING OF CA BUT STILL RULED ON THE MERITS. ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE.

 

WHAT IS THE APPEAL PROCEDURE FROM RESOLUTION OF THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR OR CITY PROSECUTOR?

 

PROCEDURE 1

PROCEDURE 2

 

WAS CA CORRECT IN DISMISSING THE PETITION?

 

CA COULD HAVE GIVEN  THE PETITION DUE COURSE BECAUSE THE RESOLUTION OF THE REGIONAL PROSECUTOR IS FINAL, MEANING THE DISPUTE  CAN NOW BE RAISED  IN COURT. BUT PETITION DID NOT STATE THE DATE WHEN SHE RECEIVED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION DENYING HER MOTION FOR RECON. THUS, THE PETITION WAS STILL DEFECTIVE AND COULD BE DISMISSED. YET THE SUPREME COURT PROCEEDED TO RULE ON THE MERITS.

  

WHAT IS ORAL DEFAMATION AND INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR?

 

ORAL 1

ORAL 2

 WAS THERE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE (CONSTITUTING PROBABLE CAUSE) TO INDICT RESPONDENT IN THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR AND ORAL DEFAMATION?

 

NO SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE.

 

EVIDENCE

 

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2020-0012-Meriam M. Urmaza Vs. Hon. Regional Procesutor Nannatus Caesar R. Roja, Hon. Assistant Provincial Prosecutor Judylito V. Ulanday and Ramon Torres Domingo 

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

 

YOU MAY GO TO ANOTHER WEBSITE: jabbforms.com.

BUT THERE ARE ALSO BASIC FORMS IN THIS WEBSITE. BELOW IS A LIST OF THE FORMS HERE.

TO FIND THE FORM  YOU WANT, TYPE CTRL F. A FIND BOX APPEARS. TYPE A KEY WORD LIKE “MOTOR VEHICLE” THAT COULD LEAD TO YOUR FORM LIKE “DEED OF SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLE”.  THEN PRESS “NEXT” APPEARING IN THE FIND BOX. THE FORM YOU ARE SEARCHING, IF THERE IS, WILL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE KEY WORD IN WHITE COLOR.  BRING THE CURSOR TO THAT FORM  AND DOUBLE CLICK.

 

FORM 0028 – PARKING LEASE AGREEMENT

FORM 0027 – CONTRACT OF LEASE – RESIDENTIAL

FORM 0026 – JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT

FORM 0025: CORPORATE GUARANTEE

FORM 0024: AFFIDAVIT OF DISCREPANCY IN SIGNATURES

FORM 0023: REVOCATION OF SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

FORM 0022: PRE-NUPTIAL AGREEMENT

FORM 0021: DEED OF SALE WITH ASSUMPTION OF MORTGAGE

FORM 0020: AFFIDAVIT OF DISCREPANCY IN NAME

FORM 0019: DEED OF SALE OF CONDOMINIUM UNIT

FORM 0018: PROMISSORY NOTE

FORM 0017: DEED OF SALE WITH MORTGAGE

FORM 0016: SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

FORM 0015: ESCROW AGREEMENT

FORM 0014: LETTER AGREEMENT RE NON-DISCLOSURE

FORM 0013: NON-CIRCUMVENTION AND NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

FORM0012: AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT AND CONSENT

FORM 0011: CONTRACT TO SELL

FORM 0010: PRE-INCORPORATION AGREEMENT – VERSION 1

FORM 0009: DEED OF SALE OF UNTITLED LAND

FORM 0008: AFFIDAVIT – GENERAL FORM

FORM 0007: ESCROW AGREEMENT

FORM 0006: DEMAND LETTER RE BOUNCED CHECK

FORM 0005: EXCLUSIVE OPTION TO PURCHASE PARCEL OF LAND

FORM 0004: DEED OF SALE OF TITLED LAND, NOT UNILATERAL

FORM 0003: DEED OF SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLE

FORM 0002: DEED OF SALE OF TITLED LAND, UNILATERAL

FORM 0001: AFFIDAVIT OF LOSS