Latest Entries »

Guidelines on the Live Media Coverage of the Promulgation of People of the Philippines Vs. Datu Andal “Unsay” Ampatuan, Jr., et al.

 

TO READ THE GUIDELINES, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT OPEN GO TO DOWNLOAD AND THE FILE APPEARS AS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2019-0038-Guidelines on the Live Media Coverage of the Promulgation of People of the Philippines Vs. Datu Andal “Unsay” Ampatuan, Jr., et al. 

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “jabbulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “jabbulao and forum shopping”.

CASE 2019-0035: EDGAR M. RICO VS. ATTYS. JOSE R. MADRAZO, JR., ET AL. (A.C. NO. 7231. OCTOBER 1, 2019, PERALTA, J.) (SUBJECT/S: NOTARIAL LAW AND RULES) (BRIEF TITLE: RICO VS ATTY MADRAZO ET AL.)

 

 

DISPOSITIVE:

 

RICO 04.png

RICO 05

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

RESPONDENT NOTARY PUBLIC RAISED THE DEFENCE THAT HE DELEGATED THE NOTARIAL WORK TO HIS SECRETARY AND THUS THE ERRORS. IS THIS DEFENSE VALID?

 

NO BECAUSE A LAWYER SHOULD NOT DELEGATE THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY TASK TO SOMEONE NOT QUALIFIED TO PERFORM IT.

 

RICO 02.png

RICO 03.png

 

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW.

 

SCD-2019-0035-Edgar M. Rico Vs. Attys. Jose R. Madrazo, Jr., et al. 

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “jabbulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “jabbulao and forum shopping”.

CASE 2019-0037: MR. MRS. ERNESTO MANLAN VS. MR. AND MRS. RICARDO BELTRAN (G.R. NO. 222530, OCTOBER 16, 2019, INTING, J.) (SUBJECT/S: DOUBLE SALE OF LAND; COLLATERAL AND DIRECT ATTACK ON TITLE) (BRIEF TITLE: MANLAN VS BELTRAN)

 

 DISPOSITIVE:

 

MANLAN 01.png

 

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

THIS IS A  CASE OF DOUBLE SALE OF LAND. WHAT PROVISION OF LAW GOVERNS SUCH DOUBLE SALE?

 

ART. 1544 OF THE CIVIL CODE. ORDER OF PRIORITY: PRIOR  REGISTRATION, THEN PRIOR POSSESSION THEN OLDEST TITLE.

 

MANLAN 02 

 

DOES ART 1544 APPLY TO THIS CASE?

 

 NO BECAUSE THERE ARE TWO SELLERS.

 

MANLAN 03.png

 

BASED ON THE DEEDS OF ABSOLUTE SALE, RESPONDENT’S DOAS IS BETTER AS IT WAS SIGNED BY ALL ORIGINAL OWNERS. PETITIONER HOWEVER CONTENDS THAT RESPONDENT’S DOAS WAS DEFECTIVE BECAUSE WHEN IT WAS NOTARIZED ONE OWNER WAS ALREADY DEAD. IS THIS CONTENTION CORRECT?

 

NO BECAUSE THE REQUIREMENT OF NOTARIZATION IS ONLY FOR CONVENIENCE.

 

MANLAN 04.png

 

PETITIONER POSTULATES THAT THEIR COUNTERCLAIM TO ANNUL TITLE IS A DIRECT ATTACK ON TITLE. IS THIS CLAIM CORRECT?

 

NO BECAUSE THIS CASE IS A CASE OF QUIETING TITLE AND RECOVERY OF POSSESSION. TO CONSTITUTE DIRECT ATTACK THE CASE MUST BE ONE OF ANNULMENT OF TITLE.

 

MANLAN 05.png

 

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2019-0037-Mr. Mrs. Ernesto Manlan Vs. Mr. and Mrs. Ricardo Beltran

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “jabbulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “jabbulao and forum shopping”.

CASE 2019-0036: ADELFA PROPERTIES, INC. VS. ATTY. RESTITUTO S. MENDOZA (A.C. NO. 8608. OCTOBER 16, 2019, PERALTA, J.) (SUBJECT/S: DISBARMENT; SUSPENSION; LAWYER-CLIENT RELATION; CONFIDENTIALITY) (BRIEF TITLE: ADELFA PROPERTIES VS ATTY MENDOZA)

  

DISPOSITIVE:

 

MEND 01.png

 

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

WHAT IS THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE RULE?

 

THAT THE LAWYER MUST KEEP INVIOLATE HIS CLIENT’S SECRETS OR CONFIDENCE. SUCH DUTY MUST BE OBSERVED EVEN AFTER THE TERMINATION OF THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP AND EVEN AFTER THE DEATH OF THE CLIENT.

 

MEND 02.png

 

 WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR DISBARMENT OR SUSPENSION OF A LAWYER?

 

MEND 03.png

  

ATTY. MENDOZA ALLOWED HIMSELF TO BE INTERVIEWED BY MEDIA IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LABOR CASE AGAINST COMPLAINANT. IS THIS IMPROPER?

 

YES, IT IS NOT PROPER UNDER THE FOLLOWING RULE.

 

MEND 04.png

 

CAN CLIENT REVEAL CONFIDENCES OR SECRETS OF HIS CLIENT?

 

NO EXCEPT AS STATED IN THE RULES TO WIT:

 

MEND 05

 TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW.

 

SCD-2019-0036-Adelfa Properties, Inc. Vs. Atty. Restituto S. Mendoza

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “jabbulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “jabbulao and forum shopping”.