DISPOSITIVE:

ACCORDINGLY, the Petitio for Review is DENIED. The
Decision, dated August 26, 2020, of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.
1 54367 is AFFIRMED.


SO ORDERED.

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

In the present case, the word “NI KON,” which appears on both ISCO
and Nikon Corp. ‘ s trademarks, also onstitutes the trade name of Nikon
Corp.90 Moreover, through the domi I ancy test, the Court has established
ISCO’ s colorable imitation ofNikon C ,rp.’ s N/KONtrademark, arising from
the opposing trademarks’ glaring simi arity as to words, sound, and general
appearance.


Thus, ISCO cannot register its IKON trademark, which constitutes
Nikon Corp. ‘ s trade name, as it would l”kely mislead the public.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

AAASC-2025-00025-Isco Holding Corporation Vs. Nikon CorporationDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.