Archive for June, 2022


SC CASE 2022-0023: RAQUEL G. DY BUNCIO VS. LEONTINA SARMENTA RAMOS AND FERNANDO RAMOS (G.R. NO. 206120, 23 MAR 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT/S: JURISDICTION OF DAR; TENANCY RELATIONSHIP) (BRIEF TITLE: BUNCIO VS RAMOS)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
June 27, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

BUNCIO FILED AN ILLEGAL POSSESSION CASE AGAINST RESPONDENTS WHO ALLEGED THAT THEIR FOREBEARS HAVE LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT WITH THE PARENTS OF BUNCIO. RTC REFERRED THE CASE TO DAR. SUPREME COURT RULED THAT DAR HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE. MERE ALLEGATION OF AN AGRARIAN DISPUTE IS SUFFICIENT BASIS FOR DAR TO HAVE JURISDICTION.

WHAT IS TENANCY RELATIONSHIP?

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0023-raquel-g.-dy-buncio-vs.-leontina-sarmenta-ramos-and-fernando-ramosDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0022: SERFLEX, INC. VS. LOVELYNN M. URERA, SHERRYL I. CABRERA, PRECIOUS C. PALANCA AND JOCO JIM L. SEVILLA (G.R. NO. 246369, 29 MAR 2022, INTING, J.) (SUBJECT/S: LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING) (BRIEF TITLE: SERFLEX VS URERA ET AL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
June 26, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

PETITIONER HAS A SERVICE CONTRACT WITH PLDT. IT WAS ADJUDGED ENGAGED IN LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING. IT DID NOT PROVIDE EQUIPMENT NOR PREMISES TO THE RESPONDENT EMPLOYEES. PLDT PROVIDED THESE.   ALSO, IT DID NOT HAVE POWER OF CONTROL OVER THE EMPLOYEES. PLDT EXERCISED SUCH CONTROL.

WHAT IS RIGHT OF CONTROL OVER THE EMPLOYEES?

WHAT IS LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING?

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0022-serflex-inc.-vs.-lovelynn-m.-urera-sherryl-i.-cabrera-precious-c.-palanca-and-joco-jim-l.-sevillaDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0021: Abner R. Mangubat Vs. Atty. Reynaldo L. Herrera (A.C. NO. 9457, 05 APRIL 2022, PER CURIAM) (SUBJECT/S: DISBARMENT, WHEN PROPER) (BRIEF TITLE: MANGUBAT VS ATTY HERRERA)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
June 25, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

HERRERA COMMITTED INFRACTIONS STATED BELOW. HIS COLLECTIVE CONDUCT TARNISHES THE INTEGRITY OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND IS IN CLEAR DISREGARD OF HIS SWORN DUTIES IN THE LAWYER’S OATH.

THE SUPREME COURT CITED CASES WHERE PENALTY OF DISBARMENT WAS IMPOSED AND SAID THAT THE INFRACTIONS OF ATTY HERRERA ARE GRAVER THAN THE INFRACTIONS IN THOSE CASES.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0021-abner-r.-mangubat-vs.-atty.-reynaldo-l.-herreraDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment