CASE 2020-0009: OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS. PRESIDING JUDGE JOSELITO C. VILLAROSA, FORMERLY OF BRANCH 66, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MAKATI CITY (A.M. NO. RTJ-20-2578. JANUARY 28, 2020) (BRIEF TITLE: OCA VS. JUDGE VILLAROSA)
DISPOSITIVE:
SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:
WHAT WERE THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY JUDGE VILLAROSA?
ASIDE FROM THESE VIOLATIONS WHICH MANIFEST GROSS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, WAS JUDGE VILLAROSA FOUND GUILTY IN THE PAST FOR SIMILAR VIOLATIONS?
YES. HE WAS FOUND GUILTY IN TWO ADMINISTRATIVE CASES.
DID JUDGE VILLAROSA HAVE PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE CASES WHEN THIS CASE WAS BEING DELIBERATED.
YES. HE HAS NINE PENDING ADMINSTRATIVE CASES.
WHAT IS GROSS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW?
TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.
NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.