Category: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES


CASE 2020-0003: ROBERTO R. IGNACIO AND TERESA R. IGNACIO DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE TERESA R. IGNACIO ENTERPRISES VS. MYRNA P. RAGASA AND AZUCENA B. ROA (G.R. NO. 227896. JANUARY 29, 2020) (BRIEF TITLE: IGNACIO ET AL VS RAGASA ET AL)

 

 DISPOSITIVE:

 

CASTILLO-DISPO

 

 SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

 WHAT IS THE LEGAL RATE OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE USURY LAW?

 

6% TO BE APPLIED NOT RETROSPECTIVELY FROM 01 JULY 2013.

 

CASTILLO-INTEREST

 

WHAT IS MEANT BY FORBEARANCE? WHAT IS FORBEARANCE OF MONEY GOODS OR CREDIT?

 

IT IS AN OBLIGATION OF THE LENDER TO REFRAIN DURING A GIVEN PERIOD FROM REQUIRING THE BORROWER TO REPAY THE LOAN.

  

FOREBEARANCE OF MONEY, GOODS OR CREDIT IS AN ARRANGEMENT WHERE A PERSON ACQUIESCES TO THE TEMPORARY USE OF HIS MONEY, GOODS OR CREDIT PENDING HAPPENING OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

 

CASTILLO-FORBEARANCE

  

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2020-0003-Roberto R. Ignacio and Teresa R. Ignacio doing business under the name and style Teresa R. Ignacio Enterprises Vs. Myrna P. Ragasa and Azucena B. Roa

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

 

CASE 2020-0002: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. R. LORENZ ESGUERRA Y BALIBER A.K.A. “RR” (G.R. NO. 243986. JANUARY 22, 2020 [DATE UPLOADED: 02/11/2020)

 

DISPOSITIVE:

 

esguerra dispo

 

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2020-0002-People of the Philippines Vs. R. Lorenz Esguerra y Baliber a.k.a. “RR”

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

CASE 2020-0001: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JOSEPH SOLAMILLO AMAGO AND CERILO BOLONGAITA VENDIOLA, JR. (G.R. NO. 227739. JANUARY 15, 2020, PERALTA, CJ) (SUBJECT/S: DANGEROUS DRUGS; PROOF OF DELIVERY TO ANOTHER PERSON NOT NECESSARY; CONSPIRACY)(BRIEF TITLE: PEOPLE VS AMAGO ET AL)

 

DISPOSITIVE:

 

SOMA-DISPO

 

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

ACCUSED ARGUES THAT THERE WAS NO PROOF OF DELIVERY OF THE DRUGS TO ANOTHER PERSON. IS THERE CONTENTION CORRECT.

 

NO.

 

SINCE THE CRIME IS MALUM PROHIBITUM THE ONLY THING TO PROVE IS THE MOVEMENT OF THE ILLEGAL DRUGS FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER. PROVING THE DELIVERY TO ANOTHER PERSON IS NOT NECESSARY.

 

SOMA-PROOF 1

 

. . . . . .

 

SOMA-PROOF 2

 

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2020-0001-People of the Philippines Vs. Joseph Solamillo Amago and Cerilo Bolongaita Vendiola, Jr. 

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.