DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

PETITIONER HAS A SERVICE CONTRACT WITH PLDT. IT WAS ADJUDGED ENGAGED IN LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING. IT DID NOT PROVIDE EQUIPMENT NOR PREMISES TO THE RESPONDENT EMPLOYEES. PLDT PROVIDED THESE.   ALSO, IT DID NOT HAVE POWER OF CONTROL OVER THE EMPLOYEES. PLDT EXERCISED SUCH CONTROL.

WHAT IS RIGHT OF CONTROL OVER THE EMPLOYEES?

WHAT IS LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING?

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0022-serflex-inc.-vs.-lovelynn-m.-urera-sherryl-i.-cabrera-precious-c.-palanca-and-joco-jim-l.-sevillaDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.