DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

MEL CHANGCO CLAIMED THAT SHE WAS A REGULAR EMPLOYEE OF ABS-CBN. THE LATTER CLAIMS THAT MEL WAS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. THE SUPREME COURT, SPEAKING THROUGH JUSTICE ZALAMEDA, SAID MEL WAS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR BECAUSE SHE PERFORMED THE JOB ACCORDING TO HER OWN MANNER AND METHOD, FREE FROM THE NETWORK’S CONTROL. FURTHER SHE POSSESSED UNIQUE SKILLS, EXPERTISE OR TALENT WHICH LED ABS CBN TO HIRE HER. SUCH FACT IS A PERSUATIVE ELEMENT PROVING THAT SHE IS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

IS POSSESSION OF UNIQUE SKILLS, EXPERTISE AND TALENT CONCLUSIVE IN DETERMINING WHETHER ONE IS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?

NOT CONCLUSIVE BUT INDICATIVE.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.