CASE 2020-0009: OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS. PRESIDING JUDGE JOSELITO C. VILLAROSA, FORMERLY OF BRANCH 66, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MAKATI CITY (A.M. NO. RTJ-20-2578. JANUARY 28, 2020) (BRIEF TITLE: OCA VS. JUDGE VILLAROSA)

  

DISPOSITIVE:

 

VILLAROSA-DISPO

  

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

 

WHAT WERE THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY JUDGE VILLAROSA?

 

VILLAROSA-VIOLATIONS

  

ASIDE FROM THESE VIOLATIONS WHICH MANIFEST GROSS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, WAS JUDGE VILLAROSA FOUND GUILTY IN THE PAST FOR SIMILAR VIOLATIONS?

 

YES. HE WAS FOUND GUILTY IN TWO ADMINISTRATIVE CASES.

 

VILLAROSA-CONVICTIONS 

 

DID JUDGE VILLAROSA HAVE PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE CASES WHEN THIS CASE WAS BEING DELIBERATED.

 

 

YES. HE HAS NINE PENDING ADMINSTRATIVE CASES.

 

VILLAROSA-PENDING 1VILLAROSA-PENDING 2 

 

WHAT IS GROSS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW?

 

VILLAROSA-DEFINITION-GROSS IGNORANCE

  

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

 

SCD-2020-0009-Office of the Court Administrator Vs. Presiding Judge Joselito C. Villarosa, formerly of Branch 66, Regional Trial Court, Makati City

 

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.