Category: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES


SC CASE 2022-0049:GOVERNOR EDGARDO A. TALLADO, VICE GOVERNOR JONAH PEDRO P. PIMENTEL, BOARD MEMBER RODOLFO V. GACHE, BOARD MEMBER STANLEY G. ALEGRE, BOARD MEMBER RENEE F. HERRERA, BOARD MEMBER GERARDO G. QUIÑONES, BOARD MEMBER REYNOR V. QUIBRAL, BOARD MEMBER ERWIN L. LAUSIN, BOARD MEMBER ARTEMIO B. SERDON, JR., BOARD MEMBER JAY G. PIMENTEL, AND BOARD MEMBER RAMON R. BANING VS. HON. WINSTON S. RACOMA, PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH 39, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, DAET, CAMARINES NORTE (A.M. NO. RTJ-22-022, 24 AUG 2022, SINGH, J.) (SUBJECT/S: COMPLAINT TO HARASS A JUDGE; INDIRECT CONTEMPT) (BRIEF TITLE: TALLADO ET AL VS JUDGE RACOM

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
October 4, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

THE SUPREME COURT CONSIDERED THE CASE FILED AGAINST JUDGE RACOMA AS HARASSMENT.

UNFOUNDED CRITICISMS AGAINST JUDGES DEGRADE THE JUDICIAL OFFICE. THEY DRAIN THE RESOURCES OF THE COURT IN RESOLVING THEM. THEY SOW THE SEEDS OF DISTRUST OF THE PUBLIC AGAINST THE JUDICIARY. THUS COMPLAINANTS MUST EXPLAIN THEIR ACT OF FILING PREMATURE COMPLAINT.

ON THE POWER TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT:

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0049-gov-edgardo-a.-tallado-et-al-vs-judge-winston-s.-racomaDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0048: REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JUDGE RAMON S. CAGUIOA; COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS VS. JUDGE RAMON S. CAGUIOA; CHARLES T. BURNS, JR. VS. JUDGE RAMON S. CAGUIOA ET AL (A.M. NO. RTJ-07-2063/A.M. NO. RTJ-07-2064/A.M. NO. RTJ-07-2066. AUGUST 23, 2022, PER CURIAM)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
September 29, 2022

  

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scbb8a1Download

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0047: WILLY FRED U. BEGAY VS. OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION – BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS ET AL (G.R. NO. 237664,  AUGUST 3, 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT: RULE 65 VIS A VIS RULE 45) (BRIEF TITLE:  BEGAY VS BANGKO SENTRAL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
September 18, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

PETITIONER FILED ADMINSTRATIVE CASE AT BSP AGAINST OFFICERS OF RESPONDENT BANK. BSP OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DISMISSED THE CASE. PETITIONER FILED AT CA AN APPEAL BASED ON RULE 65, THAT THERE WAS GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION. PETITIONER WAS WRONG. THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL BASIS. NEITHER CAN THE CASE BE REVIEWED UNDER RULE 45 BECAUSE ISSUES OF FACTS WERE RAISED. ONLY ISSUES OF LAW ARE ALLOWED UNDER RULE 45.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0047-willy-fred-u.-begay-vs.-office-of-the-special-investigation-e28093-bangko-sentral-ng-pilipinas-et-alDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment