Latest Entries »

SC CASE 2022-0038: PAULO CASTIL Y ALVERO VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES (G.R. NO. 253930, 13 JULY 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT/S: ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF FIREARM) (BRIEF TITLE: ALVERO VS PEOPLE)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 12, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0038-paulo-castil-y-alvero-vs.-people-of-the-philippinesDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0037: ATOK GOLD MINING COMPANY, INC., REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-PRESIDENT FOR OPERATIONS, ENGINEER ROGELIO G. FLORES VS. LILY G. FELIX, ET AL. (G.R. NO. 222637, 20 APRIL 2022, LOPEZ, J., J.)(SUBJECT/S: ANNULMENT OF FREE PATENTS) (BRIEF TITLE: ATOK GOLD MINING VS FELIX ET AL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 7, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

PETITIONER MINING COMPANY CLAIMS THAT IT HAS MINING RIGHTS OVER CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR WHICH PUBLIC RESPONDENTS ISSUED FREE PATENTS. SUPREME COURT SAID THERE ARE TWO REQUIREMENTS FOR DECLARING DECLARING NULL AND VOID THE FREE PATENTS. ONE: THE CLAIMANT PROVES ITS OWNERSHIP. TWO: THE OWNER OF THE FREE PATENTS OBTAINED THEIR TITLES BY MISREPRESENTATION OR MISTAKE. THE MINING COMPANY FAILED TO PROVE THESE REQUIREMENTS. RTC RULED THAT THE FREE PATENTS WERE VALID. CA AFFIRMED. WHEN BOTH LOWER COURTS RULED UNIFORMLY, SUPREME COURT CANNOT CHANGE THE DECISION BECAUSE IT IS NOT A TRIER OF FACTS.

……………

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0037-atok-gold-mining-company-inc.-represented-by-its-vice-president-for-operations-engineer-rogelio-g.-flores-vs.-lily-g.-felix-et-al.Download

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0036: TASK FORCE ABONO-FIELD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN VS. EUGENE P. DURUSAN, EDUARDO L. TORRES, CECILIA C. ALMAJOSE, ROMULO P. ARCILLA, JR., VICTORINA A. OLEA, VIRGILIO R. ESGUERRA, AND DANILO R. RUMBAWA (G.R. NO. 229026-31, 27 APRIL 2022, LEONEN, J.) (SUBJECT/S: COLLUSION IN BIDDING; GROSS DISHONESTY; PROVINCIAL ACCOUNTANT NOT LIABLE) (BRIEF TITLE: OMBUDSMAN VS DURUSAN ET AL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 1, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE AWARDS COMMITTEE COLLUDED WITH EACH OTHER TO ENSURE THAT A COMPANY WOULD  GET THE CONTRACT TO SUPPLY AN OVERPRICED ORGANIC FERTILIZER.

WHAT WERE THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS COMMITTED BY RESPONDENTS?

HOW ABOUT THE PROVINCIAL ACCOUNTANT? SHE WAS NOT LIABLE SINCE THE DOCUMENTS PRESENTED TO HER FOR REVIEW WERE IN ORDER.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

sceb091Download

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment