Latest Entries »

SC CASE 2022-0054: BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BCDA) VS. PEDRO S. CALLANGAN, JR., ELIZABETH BARBA-AZARES, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND ORLANDO AZARES, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT HENRY T. VILLEGAS (G.R. NO. 241168, 22 AUG 2022, LEONEN, J.) (SUBJECT/S: SUMMARY JUDGMENTS) (BRIEF TITLE: BDCA VS CALLANGAN JR ET AL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
October 26, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

COURTS MUST BE CAREFUL IN RENDERING SUMMARY JUDGMENTS ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE EXISTS A GENUINE ISSUE ON OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTIES.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

sce0591Download

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0053: G & S TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. REYNALDO A. MEDINA (G.R. NO. 243768, 05 SEP 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT/S: PENALTY OF DISMISSAL TOO HARSH. NO AWARD FOR MORAL AND EXEMPLARY DAMAGES) (BRIEF TITLE: G&S TRANSPORT VS MEDINA)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
October 24, 2022

 

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

THE PENALTY OF DISMISSAL WAS FOUND TOO HARSH. NO AWARD FOR MORAL AND EXEMPLARY DAMAGES BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE SHOWING THAT EMPLOYER WAS MOTIVATED BY BAD FAITH.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0053-g-s-transport-corporation-vs.-reynaldo-a.-medinaDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0052: LUIS RAMON P. LORENZO VS. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN ET AL – ARTHUR CUA YAP VS. SANDIGANBAYAN ET AL (G.R. NOS 242506-10 AND G.R. NOS 242590-94. 14 SEPT 2022, CAGUIOA, J.) (SUBJECT/S: DISMISSAL DUE TO VIOLATION OF PETITIONERS’ RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL) (BRIEF TITLE: LORENZO VS SANDIGAN ET AL.)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
October 22, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

NOTE THAT THE CASES AGAINST PETITIONERS WERE DISMISSED FOR VIOLATION OF PETITIONERS’ RIGHT TO SPEEDY DISPOSITION OF CASES.

EVIDENCE ALIUNDE PRESENTED DURING HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH MUST BE CONSIDERED.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0052-luis-ramon-p.-lorenzo-vs.-hon.-sandiganbayan-et-al-arthur-cua-yap-vs.-sandiganbayan-et-alDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment