Category: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES


SC CASE 2022-0004: ARIEL M. REYES VS RURAL BANK OF SAN RAFAEL (BULACAN) INC ET AL. (G.R. NO. 230597, 23 MARCH 2022) (SUBJECT/S: PENALTY OF DISMISSAL TOO SEVERE FOR INFRACTION COMMITTED) (BRIEF TITLE: REYES VS RURAL BANK OF SAN RAFAEL)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
May 20, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SO ORDERED.

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

REYES REFUSED TO CERTIFY THE REPORT ON CRIMES AND LOSSES. BUT THIS WAS NOT ATTENDED BY WRONGFUL ATTITUDE WHICH WARRANTS THE ULTIMATE PENALTY OF DISMISSAL.

THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT THE PENALTY OF DISMISSAL IMPOSED ON REYES WAS TERRIBLY DISPROPORTIONATE TO HIS INFRACTION.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-202Download

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0003: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS XXX (G.R. NO. 248815, 23 MARCH 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT’S: RAPE) (BRIEF TITLE: PEOPLE VS XXX)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
May 19, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SO ORDERED.

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

IN RAPE CASES CONVICTION MOST OFTEN RESTS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF THE TESTIMONY OF THE VICTIM.

WHENEVER THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN AFFIDAVIT AND TESTIMONY, THE LATTER IS ACCORDED GREATER WEIGHT.

ASSESSMENT OF CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES IS BEST LEFT TO THE TRIAL COURT JUDGE BECAUSE HE OBSERVES THE DEPORTMENT AND DEMEANOR OF THE WITNESS.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0003-people-of-the-philippines-vs.-xxxDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2021-0053: OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMININSTRATOR VS HON. ROMEO M. ATILLO, JR. (A.M. NO. RTJ-21-018, 29 SEPT 2021, INTING, J.) (SUBJECT/S: JUDGE POSTING PERSONAL PICTURES IN SOCIAL MEDIA HELD IMPROPER) (BRIEF TITLE: OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS JUDGE ATILLO)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
May 17, 2022

 

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SO ORDERED.

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

JUDGE ATILLO POSTED PICTURES IN HIS FACEBOOK ACCOUNT SHOWING HIS HALF-DRESSED BODY AND TATTOOED TORSO. SUPREME COURT SAID THIS IS IMPROPER FOR A JUDGE.

………………………..

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0053-office-of-the-court-administrator-vs.-hon.-romeo-m.-atillo-jr.-executive-judge-and-presiding-judge-regional-trial-court-br.-31-agoo-la-unionDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment