Category: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES


SC CASE 2022-0040: PHILIPPINE TRANSMARINE CARRIERS, INC. AND/OR SEASPAN CREW MANAGEMENT LTD. AND/OR CARLOS SALINAS VS. ALLAN N. TENA-E (G.R. NO. 234365, 06 JULY 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT: PHYSICIAN’S REPORT ON MEDICAL/PHYSICIAL CONDITION OF EMPLOYEE) (BRIEF TITLE: PHILIPPINE TRANSMARINE VS TENA-E)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 15, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

THERE WERE SEVERAL MEDICAL REPORTS. THE PHYSICIANS OF CHOICE SUBMITTED REPORTS. COMPANY PHYSICIAN DR SANEZ ALSO SUBMITTED REPORT. SUPREME COURT FAVORED THE REPORT OF DR SANES AS HE ACTUALLY TREATED RESPONDENT  AND MONITORED HIS CONDITION. RESPONDENT’S PHYSICIANS’ FINDINGS WERE BASED ONLY ON GENERAL IMPRESSIONS AFTER CONDUCTING A SINGLE EXAMINATION.

…………………………..

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0040-philippine-transmarine-carriers-inc.-and-or-seaspan-crew-management-ltd.-and-or-carlos-salinas-vs.-allan-n.-tena-eDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0039: C.F. SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT INC. AND/ORREEDEREI CLAUS-PETER OFFEN (GMBH & CO.) VS. ROBERTO B. DAGANATO (G.R. NO. 243399, 06 JUL 2002, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT/S: CLAIM OF SEAMAN FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS) (BRIEF TITLE: C.F. SHARP VS DAGANATO)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 13, 2022

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?

RESPONDENT WAS REPATRIATED DUE TO HIS AILMENT WHICH MADE HIM . PETITIONER SAID RESPONDENT WAS REPATRIATED BECAUSE HIS CONTRACT EXPIRED. SUPREME COURT SAID PETITIONER WAS WRONG BECAUSE WHY WOULD PETITIONER RECOMMEND THAT RESPONDENT UNDERGO MEDICAL EXAMINATION IF HIS CONTRACT ALREADY EXPIRED. FURTHER, COMPANY PHYSICIAN DECLARED HIM WITH DISABILITY. SINCE PHYSICIAN FAILED WITHIN THE REQUIRED PERIOD TO DECLARE WHETHER THE DISABILITY WAS PERMANENT AND TOTAL THE SAME IS PRESUMED TO BE PERMANENT AND TOTAL.

SUPREME COURT ADJUSTED THE BENEFITS DUE RESPONDENT OTHERWISE IT WOULD RESULT TO UNJUST ENRICHMENT.

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment

SC CASE 2022-0038: PAULO CASTIL Y ALVERO VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES (G.R. NO. 253930, 13 JULY 2022, HERNANDO, J.) (SUBJECT/S: ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF FIREARM) (BRIEF TITLE: ALVERO VS PEOPLE)

Filed under: LATEST SUPREME COURT CASES — Leave a comment
August 12, 2022

 

DISPOSITIVE:

SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.

scd-2022-0038-paulo-castil-y-alvero-vs.-people-of-the-philippinesDownload

NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH  JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST  TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.

Comment