DISPOSITIVE:


SUBJECTS/DOCTRINES/DIGEST:
WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE?
PETITIONER WAS ACCUSED OF ROBBERY. HE WAS FOUND TO BE IN POSSESSION OF THE STOLEN THINGS. THE PRESUMPTION IS ONE WHO IS IN POSSESSION OF SUBJECT STOLEN THINGS IS THE PERPETRATOR. HE WAS NOT ABLE TO REBUT THIS PRESUMPTION.

THE THINGS STOLEN WERE RECOVERED. BUT RTC STILL AWARDED CIVIL INDEMNITY BASED ON THE VALUE OF THE STOLEN THINGS. IS THIS PROPER?
NO.

……………………………………………………

TO READ THE DECISION, JUST CLICK/DOWNLOAD THE FILE BELOW. IF FILE DOES NOT APPEAR ON SCREEN GO TO DOWNLOAD. IT IS THE FIRST ITEM. OPEN IT.
NOTE: TO RESEARCH ON A TOPIC IN YAHOO OR GOOGLE SEARCH JUST TYPE “attybulao and the topic”. EXAMPLE: TO RESEARCH ON FORUM SHOPPING JUST TYPE “attybulao and forum shopping”.






